A Good Example of Bad Conclusions

Unless The Register has missed something out of its report, or I'm not thinking straight, there is a serious flaw in Hitwise's conclusion that Brits' greater use of social networking sites than search engines prove that they are  "more interested in talking about themselves than they are in learning about their world".

How does one reach that  conclusion? Perhaps there is a legitimate chain of logic, but I can't see it, and it hasn't been explained as far as I can see. It's an excellent example of the need to probe beyond the headlines and soundbites, and to teach our pupils to do the same.

Anyway, any true narcissist wouldn't bother to visit social networks to see what people are saying about them: they'd set up a few Google Alerts.

That's what I've done, anyway.

I'm back!

This is just a very quick update. Having sorted out my computer problems (fingers crossed and touch wood), reinstalled loads of software and (hopefully) not lost any data, I'm now almost ready to start writing again.

After I've done a mega backup, installed Tweetdeck and actually gone out to earn a crust, I will be back with some new articles.

In the meantime, take a look at this report by Patrick Hadfield on the 140 Meetup panel discussion I took part in last week. Some very interesting issues were raised, from a wide variety of people (mostly from outside the education profession).

What's happening here?

This is just a quick post to keep my loyal readers (hi, mum and dad!) informed of what's going on. I don't have time to go into all the gory details right now, but suffice it to say that I am currently working on a borrowed computer having expended loads of time and energy dealing with my own one, have been descended upon by relatives virtually unannounced, and just to bring the number of things up to three (things always happen in threes, so they say), my exhaust dropped off a few days ago. Well, the exhaust from my car if you are going to be pedantic about it.

So the upshot is this:

  1. I have had to focus on my work in the reduced time and energy I've had available. I am sure you understand the need to put bread on the table. Not that we eat bread, but you know what I mean.
  2. I will be writing about a visit to the RM REAL Centre soon, my experiment with setting up a newswire in Publish2, which I have been a member of for a couple of years, and of course continuing with the 31 Days to Become a Better Ed Tech Leader series.

But right now I have to drive my car to the garage to have the exhause fixed. If you live in my neck of the woods and you hear what sounds like a tank going past, it's probably me. Don't forget to wave as I crawl past.

A slight glitch....

Unfortunately, I haven't been able to get the latest '31 Days' article out today. I have been somewhat distracted by the fact that some problems I have been having with my computer have been nailed down to an impending hard drive failure! (Fortunately, the computer came with a pretty good diagnostics program that identified the fault.)

I am extremely assiduous in taking backups of data. However, before the computer goes off to be sorted out (it's still under Warranty) I wish to erase all the data off the drive, and because I know that some vital piece of information will be found to be missing after I've done that, I've been double-checking that software licence numbers have been noted down, vital emails forwarded on to my lady wife (as well as backed up) etc etc. It all takes time, and is rather distracting, as you will know if you have had this happen to you (who hasn't?).

More articles will appear soon, but in the meantime I hope you enjoy reading what's already been published here. Look down the left-hand side of the page for the last 10 articles.

Thank you for your forebearance.

Constructing Education for the Future

I've been invited by Bernie Mitchell to take part in a panel discussion at one of the #140 Conference Meetups. The topic to get us started is:

Constructing Education - Do we have a real time responsibility to future generations - NOW? (And what does that look like?)

Here are my initial thoughts.

There is a temptation to say, like Sir Boyle Roche,

What has posterity ever done for us?

I believe that would be both shortsighted and wrong, for the following reasons:

  • The future is closer than we think. The pace of change, as measured by, say, adoption rates, is so fast these days that anything we do now, or fail to do, is likely to have repercussions in our own lifetime. So from a self-interest point of view if nothing else, we'd be pretty stupid not to exercise responsibility towards future generations.
  • On moral or ethical grounds (I'm never quite sure of the difference), why would anyone go into teaching if they were not committed to the welfare of future generations? I like to think that not everyone goes into teaching as an interim measure between more lucrative forms of employment.
  • The term 'real time' is quite interesting. It suggests the idea of changing education according to needs much more quickly than is usually true. It ties in with an idea I've had for some time, which is that if you want schools to succeed you have to give them more freedom rather than less. Micromanagement stifles creativity in commercial life; surely the same is true in education?
  • That being the case, if I am right then what we need to do is construct an education system which is minimalist, rather than detailed.
  • We also need to somehow remove the risk of failure from the educational process. Many teachers/schools are so concerned about league tables that they dare not risk trying out new approaches, such us using Web 2.0 applications in the classroom. I wonder if there is a way of allowing innovation -- especially using educational technology -- without risking students' life chances or Headteachers' careers? The fact is, not innovating and not using technology are just as risky as taking risks!
  • That's because the world is changing. The world is becoming a Web 2.0 world. I may have a chance to say more about this tomorrow, but basically the point is this, and it has been made many times by many people: there is little point in educating future generations for life and work in a world that is gradually disappearing.

If you can make it to Holborn Piccadilly in London tomorrow evening, I hope you will be able to join me and a brilliant line up of other panelists and a great bunch of participants to discuss such matters. What are your  thoughts?

STOP PRESS! The venue has changed: it is now at the Grace Bar, 42-44 Great Windmill Street, London W1D 7NB.

31 Days to Become a Better Ed Tech Leader -- Day 28: Start a Surgery

Here's a question for you: if you were thinking of doing something different, and you had two choices, which of these would you go with? Option A, where there is little or no support available, or Option B, where there's a lot of support available. I think most people would choose Option B, if all other characteristics of the two options were equal.

A task a day for 31 daysThe same goes for using educational technology. Despite the fact that many people use it in their everyday lives, there is still a reluctance on the part of some people to use it in the classroom. As well as putting on in-service training for people, having user-friendly how-to guides on the wall, and making sure that the technical support is first class, there is another thing you can try: starting a surgery. This is a difficult thing to recommend actually, because it can involve working beyond the school day, and asking others to do the same. (The fact that many teachers do so anyway is neither here nor there.)

So I'll explore some options, once I've described what I mean by a 'surgery'. It works along the same lines as a doctor's surgery: if something is wrong, or you're not sure about how to do something, the idea is that you can pop along to the surgery, where someone will be delighted to help out.

The great thing about setting up a surgery is that it provides yet one more safety net for those colleagues who are less than confident when it comes to use technology in their work.

The traditional model of a surgery, which is still used in many schools, is where the Head of ICT or Educational Technology Co-ordinator makes herself or himself available every Wednesday (say) for an hour after school. Where people are willing to 'muck in' and take turns to do it, so much the better.

A far better option, if you can set it up, is the one I saw in a school I supported when I was an ICT advisor. They had set up a computer area for staff use only, as I recommended here, but they had gone a step further. The staff computer area was also the Head of ICT's office, in effect, and it was shared with his technician. Consequently, there was someone available to give assistance at pretty much any time of day. As if that wasn't enough, there was a kettle and a coffee machine, with a tin of biscuits plus milk and sugar for people to help themselves to. Yes, you're not supposed to eat or drink in a computer area. Yes, it cost them money to provide those refreshments. And yes, the room was in use all the time.

Another model, if you can arrange it, is to arrange for each member of staff in your team to use one of their free periods (assuming you have them) in exchange for not being asked to cover a lesson at that time. The benefit for the teacher is that she knows where she is going to be, and can take some work in to do. If your Principal is very wedded to the idea of staff using the technology, you should be able to make a persuasive argument for this sort of thing.

A variation on that theme is to ask members in the technical support team and/or classroom assistants to do some of their work in the computer room at particular times in the week, so that they can be available to assist teachers if required. There is also nothing to stop you creating a kind of 'virtual surgery', comprising walkthroughs in the form of videos or screen captures. A virtual surgery is obviously not personalised in the same way that  a physical one is. However, by making a set of guides available in this way it is possible that you may alleviate many of the problems which come up in a typical surgery anyway.

Don't believe me? I know of one part-time educational technology co-ordinator in a primary (elementary) school who reduced the number of enquiries made of her from several a day to one or two per week. How? By the simple expedient of placing a ring binder folder in the computer room with some How-to guides for staff -- and lots of blank pages, along with the simple request:

If you have a problem and then discover the solution, please write it all down here so that others can benefit.

It was, in effect, a paper version of a wiki. Why not use a real wiki? Set one up so that staff who feel confident enough can share their expertise and solutions.

Making this facility, and the walkthroughs, available online means that if you don't have a computer room in your school it doesn't matter, because people will be able to use them at home or in their own area in school.This will also be a useful facility if you don't have a computer room.

Another interesting approach is to have a pupil rota, such as at lunchtime. The benefit for them is that they get to use their favourite applications or continue with their work, and helping staff can be a great confidence booster. Unfortunately, having a student roster doesn't usually obviate the need to have a member of staff present as well. From staff's point of view, they are likely to obtain help faster, though; and you benefit by being rushedoff your feet only half as much as you would have been! (At least until word gets round about what a great service is being provided!)

Bottom line: a surgery can be yet another lifeline for reluctant teachers -- the removal of yet another barrier to entry.